Original rendering by Aristo T.
of an ordinary photo from www.supermodels.nl
PAGE 8 -- WELCOME!!!
>>>>>>LINK TO PAGE 9 OF 10.
The maximum page number, then, being 10, content
regularly reprinted in B.A.B., or Big Art Booklets,
and new articles or comments from the main section
inserted to replace earlier articles in these higher-
numbered pages of the archive section according
to what feels appropriate to have on a longer-lasting
display at any time; as stated several places, we
do not correct spelling or light grammatical issues
of any kind as long as meaning gets through, in
accordance with a philosophy of coherent productiveness
without meaningless stylification in a soulless manner.]]]
For copyright conditions of these archived
news articles by S Henning W B Reusch, whose
artist name is Aristo Tacoma, see the topscript
of where they first appeared, namely at the
'comments on general features of breaking
news in world economy section' of the worldwide
standard search engine Yoga6d.org (and its
various entirely identical entry-points,
which are named after many of the near-ascii
languages it is supporting, -- we use these
various entry-points so as to distribute the
traffic to this search engine. Cfr
www.yoga6d.org/economy.htm. To get into
anyone of the search entry points, click at
the 'search now' drawing at the front of
yoga6d.org, then click on the next image,
the one about 'saving humanity', and you
can search using ascii ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
(upper as lowercase are the same), optionally
with digits inside, for a selection of words
found on top at the front of most webpages.
As for how to anglify a word written in another
language, you have to try out what works -- the
rules for translation into the ascii set e.g.
from something like the rather different russian
language are simplistic and not done according
to the context in which the letters appear.
Once you learn how to work with this search
engine, and learn how to do search-within-a-page
when you get many results with the browser
'find-text-in-page' command, you will see that
your overall productivity in all areas of life
is enhanced, and the freedom from imposed
simulations of 'contexts' (such as by boolean
'AND' across a lot of the internet) essentially
turns out to be stimulating, because it is
predictable, straightforward, and honest in
a computer program mechanical way that you
can and will learn to harness.
But now, for the archive. In the archive,
we keep the same type of sequence as in the
economy.htm news section -- namely, the newest
on top.
[[[Spelling variations are part of the
soul of writing and convey information
on its own, as does variations in lineshift
usage.]]]
[[[Once in a while we will remove something
from this archive section so the overall
quantity is at all time quite moderate;
for those who wish reprints of earlier
works they will then with some level of
probability be able to trace them as
chapters in published nonfiction books
by this author.]]]
[[[Note: THE TEXTS TO BE ARCHIVED ARE AS
A RULE PUT THERE RATHER AT THE SAME TIME
AS THEY APPEAR IN THE MAIN ../economy.htm
NEWS SECTION. THESE USUALLY HAVE FEATURES
INVOLVING FOUNDATIONAL THOUGHTS ON WHICH
MUCH THINKING APART FROM WHAT GOES ON
JUST WHEN IT WAS WRITTEN CAN BE FOUNDED.
THEY ALSO USUALLY APPEAR AS CHAPTERS IN
THE ALWAYS FRESH BOOKS EACH YEAR SIGNED
BY ARISTO TACOMA. THESE BOOKS ARE SOLD
ALSO AT PHILOSOPHICAL TALKS WITH LIGHT
SEMINARS ARRANGED THE SAME DAY AS
SPRING/BI PAINTING EXHIBITIONS OPEN,
WITH THE CHARACTERISTIC APPROACH OF
SPRING/BI WITH A WOODEN BACKGROUND ON
WHICH BLACK AND SPRING GREEN ARE
APPLIED WITH PLEASANTLY UNRULY LINES,
AS BRIEFLY INDICATED AT THE DICTIONARY
yoga4d.org/super.]]]
A VISION OF THE UNIVERSE FROM ONE WHO SUBSCRIBES NEITHER
TO CLASSICAL CREATIONISM NOR CLASSICAL BIGBANGISM AND
CERTAINLY NOT TO NARROW-MINDED DARWINISM
-- Q&A, a user's guide to the universe shaped by
intuition, and inspired by this author's super-model
theory
[As of 2011:5:10 (evening, as for GMT hours)]
Author of comment can contacted at atiroal@yoga6d.org]
: How many galaxies are there? Or are there infinitely
many?
/ There are not infinitely many. But there are a great
many more than even the most sensitive instruments
created by human beings are anywhere near detecting.
: Is the universe expanding? And if so, is the rate of
expansion shifting?
/ To speak of whether 'the universe' is expanding or not
means that you are attempting to visualise the
boundaries of a region which is so vastly beyond what
typical human imagination can fathom, that it can be
said that the question is best left unanswered if put in
an impatient manner. Rather, with humility to the
greatness beyond human knowledge you are attempting to
intuit here -- is the manifest universe relatively
constant in size? And if so, is there a sense in which
there is a kind of expansion going on WITHIN that
relative constancy? And then, is this expansion having
rates, so that it itself is not constant but sometimes
on the increase and sometimes on the decrease? Yes, yes,
and yes -- to answer those three questions.
: How, if the answers to the above is yes, can there be
expansion?
/ There are greater patterns which apply than those
found to apply locally within a solar system. There are
subtle shifts of meaning of gravitation. The solar
system is a 'super-model' pattern which keeps a
coherence going, making some of these solar systems
capable of supporting life on a suitable planet within
them. Outside, in free space, there is on-going creation
of matter. There are fluctuations to the rate and
pervasiveness of this process. Such creation processes
may lead to a flying apart, to some extent, of all
galaxies in a region. That is logical, to give room for
new creation processes.
: How then do the boundaries arise?
/ It doesn't take all that much further deduction along
the lines suggested when dimensions were relativised to
each other, in what I claim to be a sketchy format
(viz., that of Albert Einstein), to come to the point of
view that the dimensions are organically entwined rather
than mechanical holders of events. These dimensions do
have natural circularities, they do not just extend. So
space as such fall off and there is a sucking in of what
touches these boundaries in a process reversely
analogous to matter creation. Thus, there is an economy
in the resirculation of the matter of the manifest
universe.
: How is this not bigbangism?
/ Where is the 'big bang'? It is an attempt to confine
the creation processes to a spot by extrapolating a lot
of unseen processes based on the scarce evidence picked
up at one planet, using bits and pieces of technology
which doesn't reach very far at all. It is an attempt to
implant human rediculous simplicity on processes which,
when seen in a more true, intelligent form, do not lend
themselves to be described by such blank maps as in
bigbangism. In addition, the initial lack of clarity in
how Albert Einstein sought to put absolute continuity
into the view of space has been propelled into a massive
lack of clarity by tring to speak of 'infinitesimal
points', whether as an assumed 'big bang' or as the much
talked about -- but as yet not closely enquired into --
phenomena which have been attributed to match the theory
of 'black holes'.
: So there are no black holes?
/ What is correct is that when stars burn their light
fuel up, a condensation into heavier stuff may happen
after a socalled super-nova explosion, where contraction
of the rest-matter of the star lead to the formation of
a super-intense matter region. This intensity is a kind
of peculiar piece of rock, around which certain almost
lightening events occur -- I call them 'blue-black
finitons'; this is near to some aspects of black hole
theory except that no matter the size of the star will
we not get into an eradication nor an inversion of the
matter. The very structure of manifest matter is such as
to allow a certain finite maximum intensity, and the
curvature associated with gravitation is so as to allow
a certain corresponding finite maximum intensity, and
this cannot be challenged by any super-nova explosion.
The result is no infinitesimal singularity but a finite
structure, a finiton. However there are quantum
fluctuations and so some effects emerge, so it is not
black but blue-black (by using the metaphor of light).
: What happens to matter sucked into such a finiton?
/ The finiton can absorb a certain amount but eventually
new types of phenomena arise, as it doesn't have
limitless room to tuck things away in it.
: Darwinists have suggested that the universe is full of
life, for the quantity of possible life-supporting
planets may be so very vast. Many have further proposed
that a segment of this life may have evolved into
civilisations, with technology and so on. Is this wrong?
/ It is right that the universe is full of life but the
whole approach of darwinism in ANY form is a concoction
which is made in total ignorance of the coherence
pervading universe nonlocally as one can easily
philosophically surmise may be the case by looking into
the phenomena -- not the theory, but the phenomena --
discussed in laboratories also working on quantum
physics in the 20th century and onwards. Darwinism tries
to make the whole by throwing pieces around and
injecting millions or billions of years. But even
trillions of years would not properly groom the
coherence aspects of even one single healthy adult human
being. You see the billionaires on Earth trying to buy
themselves out of their decay -- buying organs ripped
from the bodies of poor people -- this is the real trash
status of life science on Earth. Life, to human
scientists, is a total mystery: and especially human
life. To tamper with life is easy: but to tamper with
life is no proof whatosever of having a proper theory of
it. And most of the life of the human being is in terms
of matter and energies which are more subtle than that
which can be measured -- but hinted at, if one in a
relaxed way, a philosophical way, muses over nonlocality
and such.
: When you say 'more subtle forms of matter', are you
saying that there is a great deal more to the universe
than that which is observable?
/ The word 'observable' is a giant one, I wouldn't
easily use that. Even in some forms of cosmological
quantum theory it is surmised that manifest matter --
the universe of stars and galaxies and planets and such
-- is a mere surface scratch on top of an ocean of
energy. I assert that this is the intuitively
appropriate position to take; but I go further than
that, and suggest that there is a higher order to the
subtle aspects of the universe. This is prior to
experienced flow of time, prior to the imagined billions
of years before Earth's manifestation of life, and this
asserts something about human beings from a divine
source.
A NEW LOW AS FAR AS SCIENTIFIC JOURNALISM GOES
-- In San Francisco Chronicle, which -- apart from
that piece -- is one of the more reflective news channels
[As of 2011:5:6 (early morning, as for GMT hours)]
Author of comment can contacted at atiroal@yoga6d.org]
It could be a joke -- a kind of piece a student in the
theory of science could have written just to see how
many points one can get seriously wrong in one single
short article on science. For the sake of argument, I'll
suppose it is. You can read the joke in the
acknowledgements, if you consult the site Sfgate.com, a
rather worthy world news channel, apart from the fact
it is owned by the tycoon Hearst and that they forgot
to put the date April 1st to this one.
Since it is a joke, as I take it, from their side, I
will not spend very much time on dismantling it. It is
done fairly simply. For further reading, look around
in my own works.
* We will first note that it is part of the THEORY,
not the prediction of the theory, of the general
relativity theory (GRT) made by Albert Einstein in the
early 20th century, that the dimensions of time and
space are curved wherever there is gravitation;
* And that there have been numerous INSTANCES OF
CONFIRMATION of the general view that processes
involving time are affected by gravitation in a way
similar to how acceleration affects them;
* While these instances of confirmation -- which also,
many decades ago, concerned Earth's gravitation -- the
more dramatic view which is the core tenet of GRT that
the very dimensions themselves are altered, obviously
cannot itself be confirmed.
* Rather, what has been and still is confirmed is that
there are numerical correlations connecting, among other
things, duration, gravitation and acceleration
* The theory that puts TIME ITSELF to the fourth
dimension in GRT is but one of a whole set of possible
theories to account for such a correlation.
* A less drastic theory would say, for instance, that
there is a dimension of something like process duration
-- not TIME ITSELF -- which is woven together somehow
with space and that this is curved somehow where energy
and matter persists, as in my own super-model theory
* But even if one does believe in the very drastic
view of GRT, Einstein was not among the believers that
this should imply whether black holes nor big bangs;
* In order to see clearly why alternatives to GRT are
important, one must realise that GRT as postulated by
Einstein cannot even be formulated without a certain
idea, let us call it Z, which may be a mathematical
fiction, indeed even a fiction which is incoherent
* As for this idea Z there have been some key
thinkers in mathematics who has doubted its clarity.
I have produced reductio ad absurdum proofs showing
that it is an incoherent idea.
* This idea Z was used by Einstein in formulating GRT
but it is even more used, and over-zealously so, in
formulating the singularity idea, without which both
Black Hole theory and Big Bang theory is nought.
* A certain group of theory-of-science-ignorant
scientists, dominating the present substandard state
of cosmological physics along the lines that Stephen
Hawking initiated, have consistently avoided exploring
alternative interpretations to the numerical data
involving cosmos, and got away with it, so far, only
because there are so few in the field who has got any
insight into anything they say
* These people need money and get money by purporting
that their expensive experiments touch on core insights
into reality -- and so they need journalists who, unlike
Sfgate.com, do not joke with them, but take them
seriously
* This idea Z is that of the infinitely small, which
is nevertheless not nothing.
* So, SfGate, your Z Z Z . . apparent slumber was
perhaps a bit funny, but now wake up, get the April 1
labels right, and please for the future learn to
indicate to your readers that which you know very
well: that, on the one hand, ideological poppygock
by dogmatic folks needing money in the name of science,
and, on the other hand, the art of wonder and scepticism
over any too-quick interpretation of empirical
research data called 'science', are two widely different
things to all thinking people (for further reading,
see also what I term 'neopopperian science').
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
================
Article entitled "Stanford study backs Einstein's
relativity theory" by David Perlman (science editor),
available at website belonging to the newspaper San
Francisco Chronicle, owned by Hearst Corporation,
New York, North America; dated there 2011:5:5.