Original rendering by Aristo T.
of an ordinary photo from www.supermodels.nl



PAGE 7 -- WELCOME!!!

>>>>>>LINK TO PAGE 8 OF 10.
The maximum page number, then, being 10, content 
regularly reprinted in B.A.B., or Big Art Booklets,
and new articles or comments from the main section
inserted to replace earlier articles in these higher-
numbered pages of the archive section according 
to what feels appropriate to have on a longer-lasting 
display at any time; as stated several places, we
do not correct spelling or light grammatical issues
of any kind as long as meaning gets through, in
accordance with a philosophy of coherent productiveness
without meaningless stylification in a soulless manner.]]]

For copyright conditions of these archived
news articles by S Henning W B Reusch, whose
artist name is Aristo Tacoma, see the topscript
of where they first appeared, namely at the
'comments on general features of breaking
news in world economy section' of the worldwide
standard search engine Yoga6d.org (and its
various entirely identical entry-points,
which are named after many of the near-ascii
languages it is supporting, -- we use these
various entry-points so as to distribute the
traffic to this search engine. Cfr
www.yoga6d.org/economy.htm. To get into
anyone of the search entry points, click at
the 'search now' drawing at the front of
yoga6d.org, then click on the next image,
the one about 'saving humanity', and you
can search using ascii ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
(upper as lowercase are the same), optionally
with digits inside, for a selection of words
found on top at the front of most webpages.
As for how to anglify a word written in another
language, you have to try out what works -- the
rules for translation into the ascii set e.g.
from something like the rather different russian
language are simplistic and not done according
to the context in which the letters appear.
Once you learn how to work with this search
engine, and learn how to do search-within-a-page
when you get many results with the browser
'find-text-in-page' command, you will see that
your overall productivity in all areas of life
is enhanced, and the freedom from imposed
simulations of 'contexts' (such as by boolean
'AND' across a lot of the internet) essentially
turns out to be stimulating, because it is
predictable, straightforward, and honest in
a computer program mechanical way that you
can and will learn to harness.

But now, for the archive. In the archive,
we keep the same type of sequence as in the
economy.htm news section -- namely, the newest
on top. 

[[[Spelling variations are part of the
soul of writing and convey information
on its own, as does variations in lineshift
usage.]]]


[[[Once in a while we will remove something
from this archive section so the overall
quantity is at all time quite moderate;
for those who wish reprints of earlier
works they will then with some level of
probability be able to trace them as
chapters in published nonfiction books
by this author.]]]





[[[Note: THE TEXTS TO BE ARCHIVED ARE AS
A RULE PUT THERE RATHER AT THE SAME TIME
AS THEY APPEAR IN THE MAIN ../economy.htm
NEWS SECTION. THESE USUALLY HAVE FEATURES
INVOLVING FOUNDATIONAL THOUGHTS ON WHICH
MUCH THINKING APART FROM WHAT GOES ON
JUST WHEN IT WAS WRITTEN CAN BE FOUNDED.
THEY ALSO USUALLY APPEAR AS CHAPTERS IN
THE ALWAYS FRESH BOOKS EACH YEAR SIGNED
BY ARISTO TACOMA. THESE BOOKS ARE SOLD
ALSO AT PHILOSOPHICAL TALKS WITH LIGHT
SEMINARS ARRANGED THE SAME DAY AS 
SPRING/BI PAINTING EXHIBITIONS OPEN,
WITH THE CHARACTERISTIC APPROACH OF
SPRING/BI WITH A WOODEN BACKGROUND ON
WHICH BLACK AND SPRING GREEN ARE 
APPLIED WITH PLEASANTLY UNRULY LINES,
AS BRIEFLY INDICATED AT THE DICTIONARY
yoga4d.org/super.]]]
















 
 
 
 
 
THE CHALLENGE OF THE 21st CENTURY: TO MOVE FROM THE 
"BATTLE OF THE CLIQUES" TO A MORE TRUE HOLISTIC HUMAN 
CONSCIOUSNESS OF A SHARED KIND
-- Marx predicted a battle of the classes, but he did 
not predict the technology-driven battle of the cliques

[As of 2011:4:26 (evening, as for GMT hours)]
Author of comment can contacted at atiroal@yoga6d.org]
  
Do you have a mobile phone, with text messaging? An 
email? A bulletin board membership, such as Facebook.com 
-- each person can have his or her own private bulletin
board and befriend other bulletin boards, all ruled
tyranically and censorically by the tycoons at its head, 
or Formspring.me, which so sweetly lends itself to 
make anonymous mob-statements about classmates? 
Then imagine what your social life would be if you 
for, say, one full season of six months were to arrange 
all leisure meetings by not arranging them at all: by 
simply walking, in your spare time, some nice paths, and
go to some nice cafees, without electronic guidance, and 
see who you meet and how it is to talk to them. A pretty 
CRAZY idea, perhaps -- and yet one that appears to have 
been at the essence of mostly all of human history, apart
from the marching of armies and the spreading of 
propaganda texts written by eager leaders. The battle of 
the lower classes against the aristocracies, or obese 
ruling / dominating classes, as predicted by Marx, followed 
the notion of slow group-communication in pubs and such, 
where the notion of shared animosity towards those filthy 
rulers who assign their sons to overtake their father's 
ruling positions, eventually would mean a call to perhaps
violent political action.
  Marx, however, was too megalomaniac to become a voice
of compassion, for he ventured into the field of making
theories about reality, and even theories about theory-
making, but did so without wisdom. The 'communism' he
inspired became another clique, that of angry 
self-righteous people who believe that the essence of
dialogue and progress is conflict, and who lacked any
humility to the greater wholeness of cosmos. But the
myriad falsenesses about communism and about the writings
of Karl Marx notwithstanding, he was objectively right in
asserting the falseness of the old tyrannic ways of 
political leadership by means of something as rediculous
as inheritance, whether at the level of kings or at the
level of lesser princelings and duchesses and such --
or the corresponding roles transferred to the holders of
big buckets of cash, however much less they claim to have
any blue blood. Fairness, in the opinion of philosophers
through the ages, will win over lack of fairness.
  The imaginary blueness of the very human, very normal
blood of the dignitaries, however, belongs to a time that 
is hopefully pretty much bygone, except for the purposes 
of hopeful gossip magasines and media trying to make an 
income of what's rest of the the aristocracies by 
refusing the let go of the idea that they are important 
in SOME ways. Capitalism is not gone but the classes are
no longer felt as classes in most but not all societies.
In most places, people can improve their accent without
being accused of trying to mingle with a higher class.
Some say that London is still different on this, but
with the intense change of population culture going on,
that can't last long even in this center of one of the
oldest empires. Like the Trantor of Isaac Asimov's
Foundation writings, London is no longer at the centre
of all the events of the galaxy; however great the 
music of the English spoken in Great Britain can be
a source to "all the galaxy" ;)
  In contrast, with the introduction of person-to-person 
and person-to-bulletin-board-to-person communication (as  
on Facebook.com and Formspring.me, the latter not 
forcing people to avoid pen names, artist names and 
author names, I think -- though I have never been any 
member of any such thing at all, nor will ever want to), 
every little illusionary animosity can gather a following  
in a matter of weeks, and go to a mini-war against this, 
that or the other thing in society.  
  The challenge, as I see it, for the 21st century, is 
not only how to get inexpensive electricity, clean 
water, enough good food and good air for as many as 
possible of the suffering billions of the over-populated 
Earth, but also how to avoid the planetary communication  
technology from creating excessive fragmentation -- a 
fragmentation that history has never heard of.
  The battle of the cliques is in. Some cliques are 
militant, some fanatically dog-matically book-believing, 
some get red-headed with hot hatred on seeing 
dark-colored skin, some cliques loves some books so much 
that they burn the books of other cliques, enticing 
nations to go to war, -- and for every such bloody 
clique quarrel, there is a thousand bad but not that bad 
quarrels between cliques -- fed by the service such 
things as google.com and bing.com and ask.com are giving 
to those who write so cheap articles they are willing to  
call these articles for 'blogs', which sounds like a 
disease, and maybe is a disease, to some extent. It is 
the disease of globalised anti-holism.
  Wholeness in human consciousness -- this is what you 
need to have when your hatred is not daily reinforced by 
your bulletin board cliques, your text messages, your 
constant phones, emails, whatever -- for only by 
wholeness in your own consciousness, a wholeness that 
keeps within it all possible events, all possible people 
you may meet, can you be prepared for a day lived 
without such clique-enforcing artefacts as seem to 
pervade the 21st century as it unfolds on Earth.
  Such a holistic consciousness can however not be 
chucked aside in a corner. It is too important for 
happiness, for mental wholeness, for the meaning of what 
it is to be alive. It will find ways of combatting the 
battle of the cliques, like a flower pushing through 
cement, a flower of meditation.
 







 
 







 
 





 
 
 
THIS WRITER'S IMMODEST ADVICE TO NORWAY AND OTHER 
BANANA-REPUBLICS TRYING TO LIVE OFF OIL REVENUES
-- There are two ways to think about money -- to 
ingratiate the state to get a gift, and to make money, 
and Norway's population must shift mentality when it 
comes to money

[As of 2011:4:25 (afternoon, as for GMT hours)]
Author of comment can contacted at atiroal@yoga6d.org]
  
I know Norway a bit better than many other places but 
I'm sure several other countries are in an analogous 
position: in contrast to e.g. Sweden, the neighbouring 
country, which seems to cook up a new brand with 
brand-new factories each month, people in Norway think 
of money primarely as something which one must 
ingratiate the state, or people connected to Statoil and 
the gigantic annual state oil revenue somehow, to get. 
  In Sweden, in contrast, despite their struggles on 
many fronts, with much of the car industry fragmented in 
troubled pieces, it seems to be a rule of thumb: if you 
want money, make a factory. We all know of Ikea, H&M and 
such, but there are more such examples, and new ones 
every season.
  In Norway, there haven't been as few factories around 
since before the industrial revolution -- maybe that's a 
bit over-statement, but in some senses it is true: 
Export oil, import things.
  Now there are important things to support at a 
state-level, and that includes dance and cultural 
processes which cannot be translated into a money-making 
factory without introducing lower quality. It is a 
wonderful thing that the state has much money. It is 
however not wonderful that the overall economical 
thinking in the population is centered on consumation 
and services, leaving production to everyone else.
  It is a mentality that enforces itself by a flock 
culture, which pokes fun at people who are so peculiar, 
so self-centered, so snobbish, that they want to "make 
things themselves". What a rediculous idea! Rather, put 
on the suit, cut the holiday hair short, polish your 
shoes, and go to meetings with other uniformed people, 
and laugh at the right places and watch football matches 
and engage in skiing -- and, by the way, befriend those  
folks who have access to the gigantic oil treasure. 
THAT's economy. This is what leading newspapers 
propagandise as economy. 
  This country, Norway, has a world-reputation for 
having a kind of moral high-integrity stance also 
enforced by its Nobel peace prize: but no country with 
respect for itself, or for the future, or for ethics, 
can live off oil and avoid changing to super-safe 
inside-mountain positioned power stations of the only 
kind that can bring electricity in a clean way out to 
people and to their factories. To live off oil means 
that one is avoiding to have that happiness of those who 
relate in a first-hand way to that which is made. A 
morally high-standing country must fight to ensure that 
the world energy situation, moreover, is such that the 
type of severe poverty and brutal Middle East 
dictatorships based on oil which exists alongside lack 
of water, lack of food, lack of clean air, lack of 
industrial infrastructure is fought at the core: with a 
gigantic electricity production by a super-safed nuclear 
power industry positioned inside mountains, sea water 
can be destilled to give drinking water, water can be 
distributed to dessert areas to allow food production 
and tree re-growth, charging stations for elcars can be 
made so as to combat car exhaust pollution, industries 
can stop using coal and oil to make devices, fridges can 
keep foods better protected, river cleansing programmes 
can be implemented, simple robots can do disgusting and 
dangerous tasks such as handling dangerous waste, and 
air conditioning devices can give people in tropical 
areas a break from the brain-cooking effects of too much 
sun -- just to mention some of the benedictions of cheap  
electricity in abundance. 
  But those countries, like Norway, which live off oil, 
they are not cultivating the type of insight which 
allows fresh thinking about the world to occur: for to 
live off oil, to live off imports, means to avoid 
cultivating the skills of the hands, and to avoid 
cultivating the practical forms of knowledge involved in 
making things locally, rather than importing them from 
afar. And so, because of the lack of reality surrounding 
money in a place like Norway, there is a subsequent lack  
of understanding of just what is the right type of 
pressure and the right type of help to be given at the 
right spots on the planet to make it all work out 
better.
  My advice, then, is this: step out of the cliques, 
break down the circles who think they know anything 
about economy -- especially those who imagine that they 
are on the forefront of innovation merely by 
re-representing imported technology in a national 
make-up, or who imagine that by jiggling around stock 
market bets, they are contributing to the wealth of 
society. Step out of the flock culture, which feeds 
itself on the drug of sports and oil and constant 
chattering to keep people within the suit-dressed code 
-- which is, put simply, a code that ensures that people 
do nothing, rather than something. 
  Any state leader ought to give a number of talks if 
within a country which is addicted to oil, to contribute 
to a new way of thinking about economy. "Do you lack 
money? Make a factory!" "You need a new car? Make one!" 
"You want to learn something? Well, then, get dirt under 
your nails, throw your striped silk ties for good, and 
make something!" And, finally, "Do they laugh at you, 
because you make something while they merely live off 
passive wealth? Just keep on doing what you are doing 
for another decade, -- they will stop laughing and start 
admiring, they cannot help it. They'll come along. Trust  
yourself. Be a human being, not a slave of fixed wages." 
  So these are my immodest advices to Norway and to 
other countries in an analogous position.